Bibliography

[EuropeanCfSCEN18]

European Committee for Standardization (CEN). CWA 17284:2018 Materials modelling - Terminology, classification and metadata. 2018.

[GYTA13]

Amir Hossein Gandomi, Xin-She Yang, Siamak Talatahari, and Amir Hossein Alavi. Metaheuristic applications in structures and infrastructures. ELSEVIER, 2013. ISBN 978-0-12-398364-0.

[SAC+08]

Andrea Saltelli, Terry Andres, Francesca Campolongo, Jessica Cariboni, Debora Gatelli, Michaela Saisana, Stefano Tarantola, Marco Ratto, Terry Andres, Francesca Campolongo, Jessica Cariboni, Debora Gatelli, Michaela Saisana, and Stefano Tarantola. Global sensitivity analysis: The primer. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, 2008. ISBN 9780470725184. doi:10.1002/9780470725184.

[HU17]

J. Herman and W. Usher. SALib: An open-source Python library for sensitivity analysis. Journal of Open Source Software, 2017. doi:10.21105/joss.00097.

[Sob01]

I M Sobol. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55(1):271–280, 2001. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475400002706, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6.

[SAA+10]

Andrea Saltelli, Paola Annoni, Ivano Azzini, Francesca Campolongo, Marco Ratto, and Stefano Tarantola. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Computer Physics Communications, 181(2):259–270, 2010. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018.

[CSC11]

Francesca Campolongo, Andrea Saltelli, and Jessica Cariboni. From screening to quantitative sensitivity analysis. A unified approach. Computer Physics Communications, 182(4):978–988, 2011. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.039, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.039.

[Sal02]

Andrea Saltelli. Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 145(2):280–297, 2002. doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00280-1.

[RRSF12]

M. V. Ruano, J. Ribes, A. Seco, and J. Ferrer. An improved sampling strategy based on trajectory design for application of the Morris method to systems with many input factors. Environmental Modelling and Software, 37:103–109, 2012. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.008, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.008.

[CCS07]

Francesca Campolongo, Jessica Cariboni, and Andrea Saltelli. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22(10):1509–1518, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004.

[Mor91]

Max D. Morris. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics, 33(2):161–174, 1991. doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804.

[MBC00]

M. D. McKay, R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 42(1):55–61, 2000. doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979.

[IHC81]

Ronald L. Iman, Jon C. Helton, and James E. Campbell. An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part I—Introduction, Input Variable Selection and Preliminary Variable Assessment. Journal of Quality Technology, 13(3):174–183, 1981. doi:10.1080/00224065.1981.11978748.

[TGM06]

S. Tarantola, D. Gatelli, and T. A. Mara. Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91(6):717–727, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.06.003.

[Pli10]

Elmar Plischke. An effective algorithm for computing global sensitivity indices (EASI). Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 95(4):354–360, 2010. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.11.005, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2009.11.005.

[TP12]

Jean Yves Tissot and Clémentine Prieur. Bias correction for the estimation of sensitivity indices based on random balance designs. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 107:205–213, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.06.010.

[CFS+73]

R. I. Cukier, C. M. Fortuin, K. E. Shuler, A. G. Petschek, and J. H. Schaibly. Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory. Journal of Chemical Physics, 59(8):3873–3878, 1973. doi:10.1063/1.1680571.

[STC99]

A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, and K. P.S. Chan. A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics, 41(1):39–56, 1999. doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594.

[Bor07]

E. Borgonovo. A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92(6):771–784, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015.

[PBS13]

Elmar Plischke, Emanuele Borgonovo, and Curtis L. Smith. Global sensitivity measures from given data. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3):536–550, 2013. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.047, doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.047.

[SobolK09]

I. M. Sobol' and S. Kucherenko. Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79(10):3009–3017, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2009.01.023.

[SK10]

I. M. Sobol and S. Kucherenko. Derivative based global sensitivity measures. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6):7745–7746, 2010. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.208, doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.208.

[PW15]

Francesca Pianosi and Thorsten Wagener. A simple and efficient method for global sensitivity analysis based oncumulative distribution functions. Environmental Modelling and Software, 67:1–11, 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.004, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.004.

[PW18]

Francesca Pianosi and Thorsten Wagener. Distribution-based sensitivity analysis from a generic input-output sample. Environmental Modelling and Software, 108(August 2018):197–207, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.019, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.019.

[BF20]

Gabriele Baroni and Till Francke. An effective strategy for combining variance- and distribution-based global sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software, 134(September):104851, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104851, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104851.

[FabianPedregosaVG+11]

Gaël Fabian Pedregosa, Alexandre Varoquaux, Vincent Michel Gramfort, Olivier Grisel Bertrand Thirion, Peter Mathieu Blondel, Ron Weiss Prettenhofer, Jake Vincent Dubourg, Alexandre Passos Vanderplas, Matthieu David Cournapeau, Matthieu Perrot Brucher, and Édouard Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825–2830, 2011. arXiv:1201.0490, doi:10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490.

[MW08]

Thomas Most and Johannes Will. Metamodel of Optimal Prognosis: An Automatic Approach for Variable Reduction and Optimal Metamodel Selection. Weimarer Optimierungs-und Stochastiktage, pages 1–21, 2008. doi:10.13140/2.1.2194.4007.

[Shr96]

Regression Shrinkage. Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 58(1):267–288, 1996. URL: jstor.org/stable/2346178.

[ICG13]

Eric Iturbide, Jaime Cerda, and Mario Graff. A Comparison between LARS and LASSO for Initialising the Time-Series Forecasting Auto-Regressive Equations. Procedia Technology, 7(443):282–288, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.04.035.

[Vov13]

Vladimir Vovk. Kernel Ridge Regression. Empirical Inference: Festschrift in Honor of Vladimir N. Vapnik, pages 1–287, 2013. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41136-6.

[SBA20]

El Mehdi Saad, Gilles Blanchard, and Sylvain Arlot. Online Orthogonal Matching Pursuit. arXiv, pages 1–46, 2020. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.11117, arXiv:2011.11117.

[Owe07]

Art B. Owen. A robust hybrid of lasso and ridge regression. researchgate, pages 59–71, 2007. doi:10.1090/conm/443/08555.

[Mac94]

D.J.C. MacKay. Bayesian non-linear modelling for the energy prediction competition. ASHRAE Transcations, 4:448–472, 1994. URL: https://bayes.wustl.edu/MacKay/pred.pdf.

[Mac92]

David J. C. MacKay. Bayesian Interpolation. Neural Computation, 4(3):415–447, 1992. doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415.

[EG00]

J. Eberhard and V. Geissbuhler. Konservative und operative therapie bei harninkontinenz, deszensus und urogenital-beschwerden. Volume 7. MIT, 2000. ISBN 026218253X.

[LS81]

P. Lancaster and K. Salkauskas. Surfaces Generated by Moving Least Squares Methods. Mathematics of Computation, 37(155):141, 1981. doi:10.2307/2007507.

[MMAC16]

Raymond H. Myers, Douglas C. Montgomery, and Christine M. Anderson-Cook. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 4th Edition. Wiley, 2016. ISBN 978-1-118-91601-8.

[CK09]

Peter W. Christensen and Anders Klarbring. An Introduction to Structural Optimization. Springer-Verlag, 2009. ISBN 978-1-4020-8665-6.

[ESF18]

Stefan C. Endres, Carl Sandrock, and Walter W. Focke. A simplicial homology algorithm for Lipschitz optimisation. Journal of Global Optimization, 72(2):181–217, 2018. doi:10.1007/s10898-018-0645-y.

[VGO+20]

Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jarrod Millman, Nikolay Mayorov, Andrew R.J. Nelson, Eric Jones, Robert Kern, Eric Larson, C. J. Carey, İlhan Polat, Yu Feng, Eric W. Moore, Jake VanderPlas, Denis Laxalde, Josef Perktold, Robert Cimrman, Ian Henriksen, E. A. Quintero, Charles R. Harris, Anne M. Archibald, Antônio H. Ribeiro, Fabian Pedregosa, Paul van Mulbregt, Aditya Vijaykumar, Alessandro Pietro Bardelli, Alex Rothberg, Andreas Hilboll, Andreas Kloeckner, Anthony Scopatz, Antony Lee, Ariel Rokem, C. Nathan Woods, Chad Fulton, Charles Masson, Christian Häggström, Clark Fitzgerald, David A. Nicholson, David R. Hagen, Dmitrii V. Pasechnik, Emanuele Olivetti, Eric Martin, Eric Wieser, Fabrice Silva, Felix Lenders, Florian Wilhelm, G. Young, Gavin A. Price, Gert Ludwig Ingold, Gregory E. Allen, Gregory R. Lee, Hervé Audren, Irvin Probst, Jörg P. Dietrich, Jacob Silterra, James T. Webber, Janko Slavič, Joel Nothman, Johannes Buchner, Johannes Kulick, Johannes L. Schönberger, José Vinícius de Miranda Cardoso, Joscha Reimer, Joseph Harrington, Juan Luis Cano Rodríguez, Juan Nunez-Iglesias, Justin Kuczynski, Kevin Tritz, Martin Thoma, Matthew Newville, Matthias Kümmerer, Maximilian Bolingbroke, Michael Tartre, Mikhail Pak, Nathaniel J. Smith, Nikolai Nowaczyk, Nikolay Shebanov, Oleksandr Pavlyk, Per A. Brodtkorb, Perry Lee, Robert T. McGibbon, Roman Feldbauer, Sam Lewis, Sam Tygier, Scott Sievert, Sebastiano Vigna, Stefan Peterson, Surhud More, Tadeusz Pudlik, Takuya Oshima, Thomas J. Pingel, Thomas P. Robitaille, Thomas Spura, Thouis R. Jones, Tim Cera, Tim Leslie, Tiziano Zito, Tom Krauss, Utkarsh Upadhyay, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, and Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17(3):261–272, 2020. arXiv:1907.10121, doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.

[SP97]

Rainer Storn and Kenneth Price. Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4):341–359, 1997. URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328, doi:10.1023/A:1008202821328.

[PBDS20]

R. Priem, N. Bartoli, Y. Diouane, and A. Sgueglia. Upper trust bound feasibility criterion for mixed constrained Bayesian optimization with application to aircraft design. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020. arXiv:2005.05067, doi:10.1016/j.ast.2020.105980.

[Pow64]

M J D Powell. An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. The Computer Journal, 7(2):155–162, 1964. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155, doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155.

[GH12]

Fuchang Gao and Lixing Han. Implementing the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm with adaptive parameters. Computational Optimization and Applications, 51(1):259–277, 2012. doi:10.1007/s10589-010-9329-3.

[BGLS03]

J. Frederic Bonnans, J. Charles Gilbert, C Lemarechal, and Claudia Sagastizabal. Numerical Optimization. Springer, 2003. ISBN 978-3-540-35445-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-35447-5.

[NR15]

Anh Tuan Nguyen and Sigrid Reiter. A performance comparison of sensitivity analysis methods for building energy models. Building Simulation, 8(6):651–664, 2015. doi:10.1007/s12273-015-0245-4.